Headlines: Separation of Church and State (T23R-2)
 guardian.co.uk | The First 100 Days: President Obama's Scorecard On Church And State Americans United, DC We don't see how a presidential advisory group composed of religious leaders (and the vast majority of the council members are) can be squared with the separation of church and state. And just as troubling, the president has delayed action on ... Video: Riz Khan - Obama's first 100 days - 28 April 09 - Part 1 Obama Works to Redefine Role of Faith in First 100 Days Muslims in West must do more to engage other faiths |
Separation of church and sex and state Creative Loafing Tampa, FL A church sex workshop in Melbourne, Florida is shaking things up on the east coast. Melbourne's New Hope Church is presenting a three part series, called “Great Sex for You.†Earlier this month, the New Hope Church mailed 25000 fliers to Melbourne ... Separation of sex and state? Sermon series attracts scrutiny |
 Times Online | Christian Conservatives Will Cheer Specter Defection, but Toomey ... U.S. News & World Report, DC 1st time separation of Church and State was ever actually mentioned was when Thomas Jefferson wrote an opinion letter favoring a wall of separation between Church and State but his meaning did not mean keep religion out of public schools, what he meant ... Video: Specter Shocks Capitol Hill, Becomes a Dem The NJDC wasn't always a fan of Specter And Then There Was OneWas One: Spector's Democratic Party Conversion |
Don't divide church and state The Record-Courier, NV The truth is that under the 1st Amendment only the federal government has to maintain a separation of church and state. The local governments and schools are not bound by that restriction. That's why Jefferson called for days of fasting as governor but ... |
 ABC News | Graduation Ceremonies In a Church&lhurch? ABC News A lawsuit filed last week by Americans United for Separation of Church and State on behalf of nine students and parents in the Elmbrook, Wisc., school district, claims that conducting graduation ceremonies in a place of worship violates the ... Group sues to stop graduation ceremony at Elmbrook Church |
 Christianity.ca | Christians Must Be The Driving Force In Saving America NewsByUs, ID When you are born, in those countries, you are born into the church. You remain a member until death, or, you go to court and ask a judge to allow you to leave that “state churchâ€. There is no such thing as separation of church and state in this ... A Christian nation? |
 Miami New Times | Censorship at the root of religious license plate debate Sun-Sentinel.com, FL Opponents of Christian-themed speciality plates now being considered by the Florida Legislature say the plates would compromise the separation of church and state, and offend other drivers who don't believe in the Chrisitian faith. ... Picture, Picture, Which To Pick? Keep religion in the home, not on the Turnpike |
 Minnesota Independent | Elmbrook Schools Sued over Graduations at Elmbrook Church Today's TMJ4, WI Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed the lawsuit in federal court in Milwaukee on behalf of a graduating senior and several others who were not named. It seeks to prevent the Elmbrook School District from holding the graduations on ... Lawsuit won't stop high school graduations at church Wisconsin parents object to public graduation at evangelical church Lawsuit Protests Graduation Ceremony At Elmbrook Church |
Americans United for Separation of Church and State has urged the Florida Senate to reject a bill creating two “Christian” license plates for state motorists and warned that a lawsuit may result if the measure becomes law.
SB 642 mandates issuance of a plate depicting the crucified head of Jesus complete with a crown of thorns. It also mandates a second plate featuring a large cross, a stained-glass church window and the words “I Believe.”
“These plates clearly violate the Constitution and basic fairness,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. “It’s wrong for the legislature to favor one faith over others. If this bill passes, it is almost certain to provoke a lawsuit.
“I am frankly shocked that any legislator would think these plates are constitutionally acceptable,” Lynn continued. “It is deeply offensive when officials play political games with the sacred symbols of any faith.”
Americans United, a Washington, D.C.-based civil liberties group, has successfully blocked issuance of an “I Believe” license plate in South Carolina. A federal judge ordered the state to temporarily stop any steps toward issuing the plate and indicated that local clergy represented by Americans United will prevail in their lawsuit.
In its letter to the Florida Senate, Americans United asserted that state blessing for two license plates prominently displaying the symbols and images of the majority religion “would offend not only Floridians who are members of minority faiths, but also Christians who believe it is inappropriate for the state to issue these kinds of license plates, because they co-opt the religious symbols, images, and beliefs of their faith for the state’s benefit, thereby demeaning those sacred images.”
The April 26 letter was signed by Americans United State Legislative Counsel Dena Sher; Rabbi Merrill Shapiro, president of the Flagler County AU Chapter; and the Rev. Dr. Harry Parrott Jr., president of the Clay County AU Chapter.
The Florida Senate may vote on the license-plate measure as early as today.
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State today filed a lawsuit in federal court to block a Wisconsin public school district from holding graduation ceremonies in the sanctuary of an evangelical church.
The suit, filed on behalf of a graduating senior and several families in the district, challenges the Elmbrook School District’s decision to hold graduation ceremonies for Brookfield Central High School and Brookfield East High School at Elmbrook Church.
“Public schools should schedule graduation ceremonies at public venues where families of all faiths or none will feel welcome,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “Some parents and children do not feel comfortable attending commencement in this religious setting. Graduation is too important to leave some families out.”
Elmbrook Church displays a large cross in its sanctuary, and the facility includes other religious iconography as well. Church officials have refused to cover the cross. On at least one occasion, members of the church passed out religious literature to graduation attendees in the lobby.
The plaintiffs, who have chosen to remain anonymous, assert that they are extremely uncomfortable attending graduation at the church, given its religion-permeated environment. The plaintiffs also feel unwelcome at the church because it teaches that non-Christians like the plaintiffs, and even some denominations of Christians, will go to Hell.
Elmbrook is a theologically conservative evangelical Christian church with strong views on contentious religious and political issues. The church says homosexuality is “not an acceptable lifestyle” and is “contrary to God’s will,” attacks atheists as people “who think they are smarter than God” and even condemns TV talk show host Oprah Winfrey for promoting “a spirituality that is at fundamental odds with the historic biblical faith.”
AU’s Lynn, a United Church of Christ minister, said Elmbrook is free to teach its doctrines, but many Americans disagree with them.
“I can understand why gay kids, atheist kids and kids from other non-evangelical faith groups would not want to graduate at a church that condemns them,” Lynn said. “Public school commencement ceremonies ought to be held at a place where every family feels at home.”
AU Senior Litigation Counsel Alex J. Luchenitser, who is lead counsel in the case, added, “Graduating seniors should not be forced to choose between entering a religious environment of a faith to which they do not subscribe and missing their own graduation. Graduation should be a joyous occasion for students and their family members, and it should not be ruined by such religious coercion.”
In its complaint, Americans United notes that there are other facilities available for graduation ceremonies and that virtually all of them are non-religious in nature. Other school districts in the area use them.
Americans United is seeking a preliminary injunction barring the school district from holding its graduation ceremonies, scheduled for June 6 and 7, at Elmbrook Church or any other house of worship.
The complaint and preliminary injunction papers in Does v. Elmbrook Joint School District No. 21 were drafted by Luchenitser and AU Madison Fellow Elizabeth J. Stevens, in consultation with AU Legal Director Ayesha N. Khan. James H. Hall Jr. and F. Thomas Olson of the Milwaukee civil-rights firm Hall Legal, S.C. are serving as co-counsel in the case.
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State has called on the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to rescind a regulation put in place by former President George W. Bush dealing with religious objections to medical procedures, saying the rule could violate patients’ rights.
The sweeping regulation, implemented by Bush in December, essentially gives health-care workers a right to refuse to take part in any procedure that they say violates their religious beliefs.
“This regulation was a parting gift from President Bush to the Religious Right, and it ought to be returned to sender,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “The last thing this country needs is more Religious Right meddling in our health care.”
President Barack Obama has proposed rescinding the Bush regulation, and today is the deadline for public comment on the matter.
In a letter to HHS Acting Secretary Charles E. Johnson, Americans United urges Obama to proceed with the planned rescission of the rule, arguing that the regulation is unnecessary because the nation’s federal civil rights laws already protect employees from religious discrimination.
“Rescinding the law would pose no threat to the rights of health-care workers, and instead, would serve to ensure that more individuals have access to health care,” wrote Margaret F. Garrett, AU assistant legislative director. “The goals of the current rule could more effectively be met simply through education and outreach.”
AU also asserts that the rule is too sweeping in its approach and that it fosters ambiguity.
Continuing to enforce the regulation, AU asserts, “will have a chilling effect on health-care facilities, reducing rather than expanding health-care services for patients.”
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court decision striking down a state law banning same-sex marriage is a welcome reaffirmation of religious liberty, says Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
In its unanimous ruling, the Iowa high court makes it clear that religious denominations have a constitutional right to set their own rules about marriage but that civil law should reflect equal protection for all citizens and not be anchored in religious dogma.
“The court has reaffirmed religious liberty,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “The justices reminded us that religious groups are free to marry whomever they choose, but civil law cannot be based on any group’s theology.
“The court has recognized that civil marriage is the province of government and religious marriage is the province of the faith community,” Lynn said. “That’s what our constitutional principles mandate, and that’s the way it should be. Clergy are free to perform or decline to perform marriage ceremonies, while the government treats everyone equally when it comes to civil marriage.”
Observed the court in its Varnum v. Brien ruling, “[C]ivil marriage must be judged under our constitutional standards of equal protection and not under religious doctrines or the religious views of individuals. This approach does not disrespect or denigrate the religious views of many Iowans who may strongly believe in marriage as a dual-gender union, but considers, as we must, only the constitutional rights of all people, as expressed by the promise of equal protection for all. We are not permitted to do less and would damage our constitution immeasurably by trying to do more.”
The court also made clear that its decision protects the rights of religious groups that oppose same-sex unions.
“In the final analysis, we give respect to the views of all Iowans on the issue of same-sex marriage religious or otherwise by giving respect to our constitutional principles,” the justices asserted. “These principles require that the state recognize both opposite-sex and same-sex civil marriage. Religious doctrine and views contrary to this principle of law are unaffected, and people can continue to associate with the religion that best reflects their views.”
Added the court, “A religious denomination can still define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and a marriage ceremony performed by a minister, priest, rabbi, or other person ordained or designated as a leader of the person’s religious faith does not lose its meaning as a sacrament or other religious institution.”
Lynn said this aspect of the ruling is important, as it debunks the common Religious Right argument that houses of worship will be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies.
“Religious Right scaremongers are trying to frighten clergy with bald-faced lies,” said Lynn. “The Iowa ruling makes clear just how wrong this charge is.”
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
The Supreme Court of Kentucky should strike down a $10 million state appropriation for a university affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, says Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Americans United has filed a friend-of-the-court brief along with the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky challenging tax funding of the University of the Cumberlands in Williamsburg, Ky.
“The Kentucky Constitution is clear on this matter,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “Tax money may not be used to subsidize religious schools. We expect the court to uphold that important principle.”
Special Judge Roger Crittenden of Franklin County ruled against the appropriation in March of 2008. Crittenden declared that the aid for construction of a pharmacy school building and an additional $1 million for scholarships was “a direct payment to a non-public religious school for educational purposes,” adding this type of state assistance “is not permitted by the constitution of Kentucky.”
Section 5 of the state constitution bars residents from being compelled to support religion and bans the state from showing preference to any denomination over others. Section 189 bans tax aid to “any church, sectarian or denominational school.”
The Kentucky Fairness Alliance, a statewide gay-rights group, challenged the legislature’s special appropriation of funds for the university after the school expelled a gay student in 2006. The student, Jason Johnson, had disclosed his sexual orientation on a social networking Web site.
In their amicus brief, Americans United and the ACLU urge the Supreme Court of Kentucky to uphold the lower court ruling and strike down the aid.
The brief, filed March 31, traces the development of church-state separation in the United States and examines how that principle is protected in the Kentucky Constitution.
“This Commonwealth, its people, and their respective religious denominations and houses of worship have been well served by the Kentucky Constitution’s rigorous protections for freedom of conscience,” asserts the brief. “Those essential safeguards should not now be jettisoned, as the challenged appropriations here contemplate.
“No matter how laudatory in the short run the legislature’s objectives might be,” the brief continues, “they cannot justify the degrading effect upon both faith and civil society that results from having religious institutions compete in the political arena for public dollars and public favor.”
Dr. Paul D. Simmons, a Baptist minister and president of the Americans United Board of Trustees, is among the plaintiffs in the University of the Cumberlands v. Pennybacker, Beshear, and McGaha lawsuit. Other plaintiffs include the Jefferson County Teachers Association and Christina Gilgor, executive director of the Kentucky Fairness Alliance.
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State today expressed disappointment at the Obama administration’s decision to ask former football coach Tony Dungy to serve on the president’s Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships.
“God & Country,” the religion blog of U.S. News & World Report, said today that Dungy has been asked to serve on the council, but he has not yet decided whether to do so.
Dungy, former coach of the Indianapolis Colts football team, has well-known ties with intolerant Religious Right groups. In 2007, for example, he spoke at a fund-raising dinner for the Indiana Family Institute, a James Dobson-affiliated group that opposes gay rights, reproductive rights and separation of church and state.
Said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United’s executive director, “I am surprised and disappointed that Dungy has been asked to serve on the council. His view that civil-marriage law should reflect religious doctrine is not in keeping with the Constitution.”
Added Lynn, “It is extremely important for the advisory council to uphold civil rights and civil liberties, and I am concerned that Coach Dungy is far from the best person to do that.”
Dungy, in his remarks at the Indiana Family Institute dinner, supported an Indiana constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and suggested that public policy ought to reflect religious doctrine.
"I feel like telling people when they look at this issue of same-sex marriage . . . I'm not on anybody's side," Dungy said. "I'm on the Lord's side."
According to U.S. News, Dungy accepted the Indiana Family Institute's Friend of the Family Award and said he "embraced" the IFI’s support for the gay marriage ban.
"IFI is saying what the Lord says," Dungy said. "You can take that and you can make the decision on which way you want to be."
"We're not trying to downgrade anyone else," Dungy added. "But we're trying to promote the family — family values the Lord's way."
Lynn said it is important that the advisory council not advocate views such as Dungy’s that undercut church-state separation.
Concluded Lynn, “I look forward to working with President Obama and his staff as he develops his administration’s position on the faith-based funding issue.”
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Visit www.ReligiousLeft.US
Contact
for more info.Popular posts from this blog
DADT: URGENT - ACT NOW - Contact Your Senator(s)
Headlines: Separation of Church and State (T23R-2)
Headlines: Separation of Church and State (T23R-2)
Comments